Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

"If It May Please the Court": Analyzing the Use of Rhetorical Elements in Courtroom Opening Statements

  • Meagan Trinidad University of Central Florida

Abstract

Despite all of the research done on the influence of intertextuality, word choice, formatting, and the presentation of the speaker on opening statements in a courtroom, we still do not know which components of these statements are the most important, from a rhetorical perspective, for lower and appellate courts, respectively. My research studied opening statements from both lower and appellate court cases and simultaneously compared the aforementioned components in each. My analysis of these opening statements finds that categories which have been deemed important in existing discussions of opening statements are truly impactful, and yields some insight into what exactly makes each type of opening statement effective.

Author Biography

Meagan Trinidad, University of Central Florida

Maegan Alexis Trinidad is a student of the Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida. She is majoring in Marketing with an interest in research and analytics. She currently works as a Student Researcher at the Institute for Economic Competitiveness and assists with marketing research conducted in the university's Behavioral Lab. Upon graduation, she hopes to pursue a career in strategic planning.

Published
2018-09-29
How to Cite
TrinidadM. (2018). "If It May Please the Court": Analyzing the Use of Rhetorical Elements in Courtroom Opening Statements. Young Scholars in Writing, 14, 88-99. Retrieved from https://youngscholarsinwriting.org/index.php/ysiw/article/view/243
Section
Spotlight on First-Year Writing